Eric Blake writes:
> On 08/09/2017 10:57 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> I don't like the qmp_args name. It's not about arguments, it's about
>> sending a command with arguments.
>>
>> I'm afraid I'm getting pretty thorougly confused by the evolving
>> interface. So I stop and think how it s
On 08/09/2017 10:57 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I don't like the qmp_args name. It's not about arguments, it's about
> sending a command with arguments.
>
> I'm afraid I'm getting pretty thorougly confused by the evolving
> interface. So I stop and think how it should look like when done.
A
Eric Blake writes:
> Similar to the previous helper, we can reduce the boilerplate
> of most callers by passing the command name separately from
> the interpolated arguments. Adjust the majority of the callers
> that can use the new helpers; in the process, fixing a few
> places where we would h
Similar to the previous helper, we can reduce the boilerplate
of most callers by passing the command name separately from
the interpolated arguments. Adjust the majority of the callers
that can use the new helpers; in the process, fixing a few
places where we would have failed -Wformat-nonliteral.
