On 2017-08-14 11:07, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> On 2017-07-11 13:33, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Max Reitz writes:
>>>
First of all, OK, you don't want QNum(42.0) to equal QNum(42) at all (at
least not right now and in the foreseeable future).
You're the ma
Max Reitz writes:
> On 2017-07-11 13:33, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> First of all, OK, you don't want QNum(42.0) to equal QNum(42) at all (at
>>> least not right now and in the foreseeable future).
>>> You're the maintainer, so you decide, so I'll go along with it. :-)
On 2017-07-11 13:33, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> First of all, OK, you don't want QNum(42.0) to equal QNum(42) at all (at
>> least not right now and in the foreseeable future).
>> You're the maintainer, so you decide, so I'll go along with it. :-)
>>
>> Now, let's follow up
Max Reitz writes:
> First of all, OK, you don't want QNum(42.0) to equal QNum(42) at all (at
> least not right now and in the foreseeable future).
> You're the maintainer, so you decide, so I'll go along with it. :-)
>
> Now, let's follow up with my therefore rather useless commentary:
>
> (Feel
First of all, OK, you don't want QNum(42.0) to equal QNum(42) at all (at
least not right now and in the foreseeable future).
You're the maintainer, so you decide, so I'll go along with it. :-)
Now, let's follow up with my therefore rather useless commentary:
(Feel free to disregard, because hones
Max Reitz writes:
> On 2017-07-06 16:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> This generic function (along with its implementations for different
>>> types) determines whether two QObjects are equal.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
>>> ---
>>> Markus also proposed just reporti
On 2017-07-06 16:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> This generic function (along with its implementations for different
>> types) determines whether two QObjects are equal.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
>> ---
>> Markus also proposed just reporting two values as unequal if th
On 2017-07-05 21:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/05/2017 02:04 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> This generic function (along with its implementations for different
>> types) determines whether two QObjects are equal.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
>> ---
>> Markus also proposed just reporting two values as u
Max Reitz writes:
> This generic function (along with its implementations for different
> types) determines whether two QObjects are equal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
> ---
> Markus also proposed just reporting two values as unequal if they have a
> different internal representation (i.e. a di
On 07/05/2017 02:04 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> This generic function (along with its implementations for different
> types) determines whether two QObjects are equal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
> ---
> Markus also proposed just reporting two values as unequal if they have a
> different internal rep
This generic function (along with its implementations for different
types) determines whether two QObjects are equal.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
Markus also proposed just reporting two values as unequal if they have a
different internal representation (i.e. a different QNum kind).
I don't like
11 matches
Mail list logo
