On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:26:22PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > The Makefile checks the output of this script, and if it indicates
> > > that an submodule update is required, it uses an ifeq() to add a
> > > dependancy between "Makefile" and a phony target that re-runs
> > >
Hi,
> > The Makefile checks the output of this script, and if it indicates
> > that an submodule update is required, it uses an ifeq() to add a
> > dependancy between "Makefile" and a phony target that re-runs
> > configure (which in turns updates the submodules). If no update was
> > required,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:20:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:58:20PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > So I did the keymaps build with a recursive make call too, which
> > > > doesn't look that pretty ...
> > >
> > > I don't think that's too
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:58:20PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > So I did the keymaps build with a recursive make call too, which
> > > doesn't look that pretty ...
> >
> > I don't think that's too ugly, but I wonder if there's some way to
> > avoid
> > the recursive make call.
> >
On 19 September 2017 at 11:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> It feels like this is a similar scenario to 'config-host.mak' being
>> outdated. I don't entirely understand the logic yet, but we manage to
>> automatically re-run configure and rebuild config-host.make, when
>> configure
Hi,
> > So I did the keymaps build with a recursive make call too, which
> > doesn't look that pretty ...
>
> I don't think that's too ugly, but I wonder if there's some way to
> avoid
> the recursive make call.
>
> It feels like this is a similar scenario to 'config-host.mak' being
>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:12:55PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:40 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:58:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On 14 September 2017 at 12:55, Gerd Hoffmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:40 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:58:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 14 September 2017 at 12:55, Gerd Hoffmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > I think a better approach is to have something in rules.mak
> > >
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:58:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 September 2017 at 12:55, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I think a better approach is to have something in rules.mak
> >> that ensures the submodule is checked out correctly (only
> >> when building
On 14 September 2017 at 12:55, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think a better approach is to have something in rules.mak
>> that ensures the submodule is checked out correctly (only
>> when building from GIT, not dist), and then have the rules
>> which generate the keymap
Hi,
> I think a better approach is to have something in rules.mak
> that ensures the submodule is checked out correctly (only
> when building from GIT, not dist), and then have the rules
> which generate the keymap files depend on this.
Care sending a patch doing that for dtc?
cheers,
Gerd
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 03:24:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 September 2017 at 15:19, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > My POV is that we should a) never check generated files into GIT, and
> > we should use the submodule in such a way that it is indistinguish
> > from
On 12 September 2017 at 15:19, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> My POV is that we should a) never check generated files into GIT, and
> we should use the submodule in such a way that it is indistinguish
> from the content of the submodule being part of the main GIT repo.
AFAICT
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 03:46:34PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The keycodemapdb code is designed to be used as a git sub-module, it
> > is
> > not an external dependancy you need installed before use. In this
> > version,
> > however, the sub-module is not directly use. Instead all
Hi,
> The keycodemapdb code is designed to be used as a git sub-module, it
> is
> not an external dependancy you need installed before use. In this
> version,
> however, the sub-module is not directly use. Instead all the
> generated
> files are checked into GIT. The downside to this is that we
Hi,
This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below.
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Convert over to use keycodemapdb
Type: series
Message-id: 20170912123744.14730-1-berra...@redhat.com
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
# Testing script will be invoked
Hi,
This series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] Convert over to use keycodemapdb
Message-id: 20170912123744.14730-1-berra
An update of:
v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg02047.html
v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg02471.html
v3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg02517.html
v4:
18 matches
Mail list logo