On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 14:37 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/06/2018 23:46, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> > > > #310: FILE: hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:564:
> > > > +size = 8 * MiB * sh;
> > > > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 433 lines chec
On 29/06/2018 23:46, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
>>> #310: FILE: hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:564:
>>> +size = 8 * MiB * sh;
>>> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 433 lines checked
> Does the linux kernel use these?
> I don't believe so.
>
No, I'm n
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 15:41 -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/25/2018 07:41 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Do not match the IEC binary prefix as camelcase typedefs.
> >
> > This fixes:
> >
> > ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> > #310: FILE: hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:564:
> >
On 06/25/2018 07:41 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Do not match the IEC binary prefix as camelcase typedefs.
This fixes:
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
#310: FILE: hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:564:
+size = 8 * MiB * sh;
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 433 lines checke
Do not match the IEC binary prefix as camelcase typedefs.
This fixes:
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
#310: FILE: hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:564:
+size = 8 * MiB * sh;
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 433 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
scripts/check
