On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:05:58AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 05:56 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 03:37:21PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> This proposal introduces a new IRQ number space layout using static
> >> numbers for all devices, depending on
On 07/27/2018 05:56 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 03:37:21PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> This proposal introduces a new IRQ number space layout using static
>> numbers for all devices, depending on a device index, and a bitmap
>> allocator for the MSI IRQ numbers which
>> +/*
>> + * Other VIO devices register values, when allocated by
>> + * livirt, are mapped in range [0x00 - 0xef].
>> + */
>> +irq = (reg >> 12) & 0xef;
>
> This mask doesn't do what you intend - it will map 0x10 to 0, for
oops. yes indeed.
> example.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 03:37:21PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This proposal introduces a new IRQ number space layout using static
> numbers for all devices, depending on a device index, and a bitmap
> allocator for the MSI IRQ numbers which are negotiated by the guest at
> runtime.
>
> As
This proposal introduces a new IRQ number space layout using static
numbers for all devices, depending on a device index, and a bitmap
allocator for the MSI IRQ numbers which are negotiated by the guest at
runtime.
As the VIO device model does not have a device index but a "reg"
property, we
