On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2017-05-09 19:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The tests 033, 140, 145 and 157 were all broken
> > when run with LUKS, since they did not correctly use
> > the required image opts args syntax to specify the
> > decryption secret.
On 2017-05-31 17:59, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/31/2017 10:33 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 2017-05-09 19:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> The tests 033, 140, 145 and 157 were all broken
>>> when run with LUKS, since they did not correctly use
>>> the required image opts args syntax to specify the
On 05/31/2017 10:33 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2017-05-09 19:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> The tests 033, 140, 145 and 157 were all broken
>> when run with LUKS, since they did not correctly use
>> the required image opts args syntax to specify the
>> decryption secret. Further, the 120 test
On 2017-05-09 19:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The tests 033, 140, 145 and 157 were all broken
> when run with LUKS, since they did not correctly use
> the required image opts args syntax to specify the
> decryption secret. Further, the 120 test simply does
> not make sense to run with luks, as
On 05/09/2017 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The tests 033, 140, 145 and 157 were all broken
> when run with LUKS, since they did not correctly use
> the required image opts args syntax to specify the
> decryption secret. Further, the 120 test simply does
> not make sense to run with luks,
The tests 033, 140, 145 and 157 were all broken
when run with LUKS, since they did not correctly use
the required image opts args syntax to specify the
decryption secret. Further, the 120 test simply does
not make sense to run with luks, as the scenario
exercised is not relevant.
The test 181 was
