On 05/12/2016 09:50 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> This breaks qemu-iotests 136 for raw. It's pretty obvious that this is a
>> test case problem (uses unaligned requests to test error accounting), so
>> I'm not dropping the patch, but please do send a follow-up.
>
> ...which explains why I missed this f
On 05/12/2016 08:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.05.2016 um 05:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> There's no reason to require the user to specify a flag just so
>> they can pass in unaligned numbers. Keep 'read -p' and 'write -p'
>> as no-ops so that I don't have to hunt down and update all users
Am 08.05.2016 um 05:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> There's no reason to require the user to specify a flag just so
> they can pass in unaligned numbers. Keep 'read -p' and 'write -p'
> as no-ops so that I don't have to hunt down and update all users
> of qemu-io, but otherwise make their behavio
On 08.05.2016 05:16, Eric Blake wrote:
> There's no reason to require the user to specify a flag just so
> they can pass in unaligned numbers. Keep 'read -p' and 'write -p'
> as no-ops so that I don't have to hunt down and update all users
> of qemu-io, but otherwise make their behavior default as
There's no reason to require the user to specify a flag just so
they can pass in unaligned numbers. Keep 'read -p' and 'write -p'
as no-ops so that I don't have to hunt down and update all users
of qemu-io, but otherwise make their behavior default as 'read' and
'write'. Also fix 'write -z', 'rea
