On 20.03.19 18:26, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 2/27/19 8:18 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 27.02.19 14:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> No reasons for not reporting found corruptions as corruptions in case
>>> of some internal errors, especially in case of just failed to fix l2
>>> entry
On 2/27/19 8:18 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 27.02.19 14:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> No reasons for not reporting found corruptions as corruptions in case
>> of some internal errors, especially in case of just failed to fix l2
>> entry (and in this case, missed corruptions may
No reasons for not reporting found corruptions as corruptions in case
of some internal errors, especially in case of just failed to fix l2
entry (and in this case, missed corruptions may influence comparing
logic, when we calculate difference between corruptions fields of two
results)
On 27.02.19 14:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> No reasons for not reporting found corruptions as corruptions in case
> of some internal errors, especially in case of just failed to fix l2
> entry (and in this case, missed corruptions may influence comparing
> logic, when we calculate
