W dniu 02.07.2016 o 19:08, mar.krzeminski pisze:
W dniu 28.06.2016 o 20:24, Cédric Le Goater pisze:
Each controller on the ast2400 has a memory range on which it maps its
flash module slaves. Each slave is assigned a memory segment for its
mapping that can be changed at bootime with the Segm
W dniu 28.06.2016 o 20:24, Cédric Le Goater pisze:
Each controller on the ast2400 has a memory range on which it maps its
flash module slaves. Each slave is assigned a memory segment for its
mapping that can be changed at bootime with the Segment Address
Register. This is not supported in the c
On 1 July 2016 at 17:44, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> I have some extra patches to use a rom device and boot from flash0.
> That is for next week.
We're in softfreeze now, so really I should stop
taking non-bugfix patches, though for a new board
with missing stuff that prevents boot there's a little
On 07/01/2016 06:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 June 2016 at 19:24, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Each controller on the ast2400 has a memory range on which it maps its
>> flash module slaves. Each slave is assigned a memory segment for its
>> mapping that can be changed at bootime with the Segm
On 28 June 2016 at 19:24, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Each controller on the ast2400 has a memory range on which it maps its
> flash module slaves. Each slave is assigned a memory segment for its
> mapping that can be changed at bootime with the Segment Address
> Register. This is not supported in t
Each controller on the ast2400 has a memory range on which it maps its
flash module slaves. Each slave is assigned a memory segment for its
mapping that can be changed at bootime with the Segment Address
Register. This is not supported in the current implementation so we
are using the defaults prov
