On 02/19/2018 09:17 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 02/19/2018 03:15 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 02/16/2018 11:07 PM, Collin L. Walling wrote:
It is possible while waiting for multiple types of external
interrupts that we might have pending irqs remaining between
irq consumption a
On 02/19/2018 09:15 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 02/16/2018 11:07 PM, Collin L. Walling wrote:
It is possible while waiting for multiple types of external
interrupts that we might have pending irqs remaining between
irq consumption and irq-type disabling. Those interrupts
could potential
On 02/16/2018 11:07 PM, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> It is possible while waiting for multiple types of external
> interrupts that we might have pending irqs remaining between
> irq consumption and irq-type disabling. Those interrupts
> could potentially propagate to the guest after IPL completes
>
On 02/19/2018 03:15 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 02/16/2018 11:07 PM, Collin L. Walling wrote:
>> It is possible while waiting for multiple types of external
>> interrupts that we might have pending irqs remaining between
>> irq consumption and irq-type disabling. Those interrupts
It is possible while waiting for multiple types of external
interrupts that we might have pending irqs remaining between
irq consumption and irq-type disabling. Those interrupts
could potentially propagate to the guest after IPL completes
and cause unwanted behavior.
As it is today, the SCLP will
