On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:42:37 -0700
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not find the time.
I think we are better off
On Mo, 2013-10-14 at 15:42 -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not find the time.
I think we are better off merging them for 1.7 and
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mo, 2013-10-14 at 15:42 -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not
Il 15/10/2013 15:51, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
From 41/43:
The interface is actually backwards-compatible with
existing PIIX4 ACPI (though not migration compatible).
And does AFAIK translate to, I have tested migration from new and
old and old and new with this series? I suspect the
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:51:30 -0700
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you
On Mo, 2013-10-14 at 15:42 -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not find the time.
I think we are better off merging them for 1.7 and
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:51:30AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 15/10/2013 15:51, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
From 41/43:
The interface is actually backwards-compatible with
existing PIIX4 ACPI (though not migration compatible).
And does AFAIK translate to, I have tested
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:53:54AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mo, 2013-10-14 at 15:42 -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:51:30AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:17:59AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 15/10/2013 15:51, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
From 41/43:
The interface is actually backwards-compatible with
existing PIIX4 ACPI (though not
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:21:34AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:51:30AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:21:34AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I cannot reasonable revert a series like this before we cut GA.
It's very simple actually.
Here's a patch to disable it all.
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
index 63ae2ae..1a5a70c 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:21:34AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Please put together a summary of the testing this series has gone
through. I still think there should be automated testing as part of
this but if the manual testing is sufficiently thorough I'll
reconsider for 1.7.
Regards,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:51:28 +0300
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:21:34AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Please put together a summary of the testing this series has gone
through. I still think there should be automated testing as part of
this but if
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:51:28PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:21:34AM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Please put together a summary of the testing this series has gone
through. I still think there should be automated testing as part of
this but if the manual
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not find the time.
I think we are better off merging them for 1.7 and then - worst case,
if major issues surface - disabling the functionality at the last minute
than delaying the
Il 14/10/2013 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
pci, pc, acpi fixes, enhancements
This includes some pretty big changes:
- pci master abort support by Marcel
- pci IRQ API rework by Marcel
- acpi generation and pci bridge hotplug support by myself
Everything has gone through several
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:57:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 14/10/2013 16:57, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
pci, pc, acpi fixes, enhancements
This includes some pretty big changes:
- pci master abort support by Marcel
- pci IRQ API rework by Marcel
- acpi generation and pci
Il 14/10/2013 17:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
Are you going to do another pull request with the virtio and bus-reset
fixes?
I missed that you did the testing of the post-order changed.
I'll put them on my branch but I'd rather this kind of
change went through a bit more testing so -
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not find the time.
I think we are better off merging them for 1.7 and then - worst case,
if major issues surface - disabling the
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony, I know you wanted to review some of the patches,
since you didn't respond either all's well or you
could not find the time.
I think we are better off merging them for 1.7
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a huge series and I still am not convinced this is the right
path forward.
Also, this kind of response is quite unexpected after this direction was
discussed multiple times and largely agreed upon on the phone meeting,
and
24 matches
Mail list logo
