On 2015-06-02 19:01, Christopher Covington wrote:
Hi Aurelien,
On 06/01/2015 05:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
On 2015-06-03 09:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-06-02 19:01, Christopher Covington wrote:
Hi Aurelien,
On 06/01/2015 05:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
On 3 June 2015 at 15:34, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On 2015-06-03 09:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-06-02 19:01, Christopher Covington wrote:
I like using the BIT() macro for this kind of thing.
Thanks for the hint, I'll come with an additional patch to fix that in
the
Hi Aurelien,
On 06/01/2015 05:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net
---
Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net
---
target-sh4/cpu.c | 3 +-
target-sh4/cpu.h | 30
