From: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>

Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.

This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
CC: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>
CC: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1455895091-7589-3-git-send-email-richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
index 5d6cebb..dba0202 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int s390_pcihost_setup_msix(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
         return 0;
     }
 
-    ctrl = pci_host_config_read_common(pbdev->pdev, pos + PCI_CAP_FLAGS,
+    ctrl = pci_host_config_read_common(pbdev->pdev, pos + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS,
              pci_config_size(pbdev->pdev), sizeof(ctrl));
     table = pci_host_config_read_common(pbdev->pdev, pos + PCI_MSIX_TABLE,
              pci_config_size(pbdev->pdev), sizeof(table));
-- 
2.7.2


Reply via email to