On 24.06.2016 21:37, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 24/06/16 19:19, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
>> On 24.06.2016 19:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 24 June 2016 at 16:58, Mark Cave-Ayland
>>> wrote:
On 06/06/16 15:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
> From: Dmitry
On 24.06.2016 19:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 June 2016 at 16:58, Mark Cave-Ayland
> wrote:
>> On 06/06/16 15:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> From: Dmitry Osipenko
>>>
>>> ptimer_get_count() might be called while QEMU timer already been
On 24/06/16 19:19, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 24.06.2016 19:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 24 June 2016 at 16:58, Mark Cave-Ayland
wrote:
On 06/06/16 15:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
From: Dmitry Osipenko
ptimer_get_count() might be called while
On 24 June 2016 at 16:58, Mark Cave-Ayland
wrote:
> On 06/06/16 15:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> From: Dmitry Osipenko
>>
>> ptimer_get_count() might be called while QEMU timer already been expired.
>> In that case ptimer would return counter = 0,
On 06/06/16 15:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
From: Dmitry Osipenko
ptimer_get_count() might be called while QEMU timer already been expired.
In that case ptimer would return counter = 0, which might be undesirable
in case of polled timer. Do counter wrap around for periodic timer
From: Dmitry Osipenko
ptimer_get_count() might be called while QEMU timer already been expired.
In that case ptimer would return counter = 0, which might be undesirable
in case of polled timer. Do counter wrap around for periodic timer to keep
it distributed. In order to