On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:41:01PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:35:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:25:04PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > The simple trace backend spawns a write-out thread which is used to
> > >
On 07/24/2018 09:25 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The simple trace backend spawns a write-out thread which is used to
asynchronously flush the in-memory ring buffer to disk.
fork(2) does not clone all threads, only the thread that invoked
fork(2). As a result there is no write-out thread in the
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:35:51PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:25:04PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > The simple trace backend spawns a write-out thread which is used to
> > asynchronously flush the in-memory ring buffer to disk.
> >
> > fork(2) does not clone
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:25:04PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The simple trace backend spawns a write-out thread which is used to
> asynchronously flush the in-memory ring buffer to disk.
>
> fork(2) does not clone all threads, only the thread that invoked
> fork(2). As a result there is no
The simple trace backend spawns a write-out thread which is used to
asynchronously flush the in-memory ring buffer to disk.
fork(2) does not clone all threads, only the thread that invoked
fork(2). As a result there is no write-out thread in the child process!
This causes a hang during shutdown
