On 2017-11-17 14:15, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
>
> On 11/17/2017 02:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 16/11/2017 18:38, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>>> check makes a distinction on how it runs Python based tests. The
>>> current approach is inconsistent because:
>>>
>>> 1) a large number of Python tests are
On 11/17/2017 02:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/11/2017 18:38, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>> check makes a distinction on how it runs Python based tests. The
>> current approach is inconsistent because:
>>
>> 1) a large number of Python tests are already set as executable files
>> (eg: 030, 040,
On 16/11/2017 18:38, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> check makes a distinction on how it runs Python based tests. The
> current approach is inconsistent because:
>
> 1) a large number of Python tests are already set as executable files
> (eg: 030, 040, 041, 044, 045, 055, 056, 057, 065, 093, 118, 147, 149,