On 23.10.2011, at 22:29, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:49:40PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 22:06, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:40:00PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 17:41, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au
On 24.10.2011, at 10:25, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.10.2011, at 22:29, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:49:40PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 22:06, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:40:00PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at
On 24.10.2011, at 10:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.10.2011, at 10:25, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.10.2011, at 22:29, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:49:40PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 22:06, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at
[snip]
Reading through the patch again I think I see your point now :). Yes, the
kvmppc_host_cpu_def function only tries to fetch the host CPU capabilities.
So yes, there is basically only the masking part with what we can actually
virtualize missing. But for now we can just assume
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:25:26AM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.10.2011, at 22:29, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:49:40PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
[snip]
This gets further complicated in the case of the w-i-p patch I have to
properly advertise page sizes, where
On 24.10.2011, at 16:08, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
Reading through the patch again I think I see your point now :). Yes, the
kvmppc_host_cpu_def function only tries to fetch the host CPU capabilities.
So yes, there is basically only the masking part with what we can actually
virtualize
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:43:18PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.10.2011, at 16:08, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
Reading through the patch again I think I see your point now :). Yes,
the kvmppc_host_cpu_def function only tries to fetch the host CPU
capabilities.
So yes,
On 24.10.2011, at 17:09, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:43:18PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.10.2011, at 16:08, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
Reading through the patch again I think I see your point now :). Yes,
the kvmppc_host_cpu_def
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:49:40PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 22:06, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:40:00PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 17:41, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:12:51AM -0700,
On 20.10.2011, at 22:06, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:40:00PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 17:41, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:12:51AM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.10.2011, at 21:15, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:40:00PM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.10.2011, at 17:41, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:12:51AM -0700, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.10.2011, at 21:15, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
So, I really don't follow what the
11 matches
Mail list logo
