Anyway, this was more of an experiment than a serious fix proposal.
I believe the general idea is solid but it'll get a couple of spins to
get a
good patch for pushing. I'll send the POC as a RFC to get things
started and
we'll see what happens.
I've sent the POC as RFC here:
"[RFC drcVI
On 07/07/2017 04:14 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:31:35AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 07/05/2017 06:53 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Worth a try. I'll see if I can make a POC of this DRC reset at incoming
migration time.
Just played a little with the
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:31:35AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2017 06:53 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > Worth a try. I'll see if I can make a POC of this DRC reset at incoming
> > migration time.
>
>
> Just played a little with the idea of manual reset during
On 07/05/2017 06:53 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Worth a try. I'll see if I can make a POC of this DRC reset at incoming
migration time.
Just played a little with the idea of manual reset during migration.
I've created a
POC that resets the CPU DRCs in a pre_load hook. Then I've
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 05:41:40PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Henrique Barboza (2017-07-05 16:53:57)
> >
> >
> > On 07/05/2017 08:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 06:13:31PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > >> I just tested this patch set on top
Quoting Daniel Henrique Barboza (2017-07-05 16:53:57)
>
>
> On 07/05/2017 08:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 06:13:31PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >> I just tested this patch set on top of current ppc-for-2.10 branch (which
> >> contains
> >> the patches from
On 07/05/2017 08:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 06:13:31PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
I just tested this patch set on top of current ppc-for-2.10 branch (which
contains
the patches from part V). It applied cleanly but required a couple of
trivial
fixes to build
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 06:13:31PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> I just tested this patch set on top of current ppc-for-2.10 branch (which
> contains
> the patches from part V). It applied cleanly but required a couple of
> trivial
> fixes to build probably because it was made on top of
I just tested this patch set on top of current ppc-for-2.10 branch
(which contains
the patches from part V). It applied cleanly but required a couple of
trivial
fixes to build probably because it was made on top of an older code base.
The trivial migration test worked fine. The libvirt
