On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:12:43 +
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:25:53PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 1/9/19 3:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 09/01/19 18:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >>> so both files include each other, how nice ...
> > >> If the
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:25:53PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/9/19 3:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 09/01/19 18:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >>> so both files include each other, how nice ...
> >> If the header files are mutually dependent it makes me wonder what the
> >> point of
On 2019-01-09 18:47, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:40:48 +0100
> Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> On 1/9/19 6:28 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> When compiling with
On 2019-01-09 22:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/01/19 18:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> so both files include each other, how nice ...
>> If the header files are mutually dependent it makes me wonder what the
>> point of having them split up is ?
>>
>> Feels like either they need to be
On 09/01/19 22:25, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/9/19 3:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 09/01/19 18:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
so both files include each other, how nice ...
>>> If the header files are mutually dependent it makes me wonder what the
>>> point of having them split up is ?
>>>
On 1/9/19 3:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/01/19 18:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> so both files include each other, how nice ...
>> If the header files are mutually dependent it makes me wonder what the
>> point of having them split up is ?
>>
>> Feels like either they need to be merged,
On 09/01/19 18:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> so both files include each other, how nice ...
> If the header files are mutually dependent it makes me wonder what the
> point of having them split up is ?
>
> Feels like either they need to be merged, or they need to be split up
> and refactored
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:40:48 +0100
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 1/9/19 6:28 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> When compiling with Clang and -std=gnu99, I get the following
On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> When compiling with Clang and -std=gnu99, I get the following errors:
>
> CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/intc/xics_spapr.o
> In file included from hw/intc/xics_spapr.c:34:
> include/hw/ppc/xics.h:46:25: error: redefinition of typedef 'ICSState' is a
> C11
On 1/9/19 6:28 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> When compiling with Clang and -std=gnu99, I get the following errors:
>>>
>>> CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/intc/xics_spapr.o
>>> In file
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > When compiling with Clang and -std=gnu99, I get the following errors:
> >
> > CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/intc/xics_spapr.o
> > In file included from hw/intc/xics_spapr.c:34:
> >
On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> When compiling with Clang and -std=gnu99, I get the following errors:
>
> CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/intc/xics_spapr.o
> In file included from hw/intc/xics_spapr.c:34:
> include/hw/ppc/xics.h:46:25: error: redefinition of typedef 'ICSState' is a
> C11
12 matches
Mail list logo
