On 2013-07-14 00:35, Ed Maste wrote:
On 13 July 2013 05:12, Michael Tokarev
m...@tls.msk.rumailto:m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Remaining:
struct mbuf {
union M_dat {
charm_dat_[1]; /* ANSI don't like 0 sized arrays */
char*m_ext_;
}
17.07.2013 12:32, Jan Kiszka wrote:
No problem, as Peter already said. Please provide an according patch.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/221949/focus=221975
(an attachtment there)
http://git.corpit.ru/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=2915c3b20260b1a653fced3b584d0c2b012880dc
On 17 July 2013 04:54, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
17.07.2013 12:32, Jan Kiszka wrote:
No problem, as Peter already said. Please provide an according patch.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/221949/focus=221975
(an attachtment there)
On 13 July 2013 23:35, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm not sure that anonymous union support is universal across
all compilers used to build QEMU though - do you know?
A quick grep shows we already use anonymous unions in
a few places, so it must be OK.
-- PMM
13.07.2013 00:29, Ed Maste wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org
---
The issue comes from slirp/mbuf.h #defining m_flags, which conflicts with
a header included via semaphore.h on FreeBSD.
Umgh. How.. disgusting... :(
Here's the code in question.
/* header at beginning of each
On 13 July 2013 05:12, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Remaining:
struct mbuf {
union M_dat {
charm_dat_[1]; /* ANSI don't like 0 sized arrays */
char*m_ext_;
} M_dat;
};
#define m_dat M_dat.m_dat_
#define m_ext
