On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/06/2013 17:35, Ed Maste ha scritto:
On 28 June 2013 11:11, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
And of course if bsd-user supported 1:1 mapping between guest and host
threads on FreeBSD, cpu_single_env would have to be
24.06.2013 23:21, Ed Maste wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org
---
I have had this in a local tree for some time, and it is needed by the
BSD-user work that is now being proposed.
So I'm not applying this to -trivial, because it caused quite some
discussion. If nevertheless
On 28 June 2013 06:34, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
24.06.2013 23:21, Ed Maste wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org
---
I have had this in a local tree for some time, and it is needed by the
BSD-user work that is now being proposed.
So I'm not applying this to
Il 28/06/2013 14:54, Ed Maste ha scritto:
On 28 June 2013 06:34, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
24.06.2013 23:21, Ed Maste wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org
---
I have had this in a local tree for some time, and it is needed by the
BSD-user work that is now being
On 28 June 2013 14:03, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 28/06/2013 14:54, Ed Maste ha scritto:
An objection seemed to be that it is not really needed yet, but as
pointed out by Peter this isn't really the case. This patch brings us
(FreeBSD) in line with per-thread data semantics
On 28 June 2013 09:05, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 28 June 2013 14:03, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 28/06/2013 14:54, Ed Maste ha scritto:
An objection seemed to be that it is not really needed yet, but as
pointed out by Peter this isn't really the case.
Il 28/06/2013 15:05, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
An objection seemed to be that it is not really needed yet, but as
pointed out by Peter this isn't really the case. This patch brings us
(FreeBSD) in line with per-thread data semantics on Linux and is used
by qemu system emulation as well.
On 28 June 2013 15:47, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 28/06/2013 15:05, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
I don't understand what you mean by no need for it. We are
already multithreaded in system mode, so this is simply
making FreeBSD do the same thing as Linux.
cpu_single_env is
Il 28/06/2013 16:55, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
I don't understand what you mean by no need for it. We are
already multithreaded in system mode, so this is simply
making FreeBSD do the same thing as Linux.
cpu_single_env is protected by the BQL unless you're running on KVM.
That doesn't
On 28 June 2013 11:11, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
And of course if bsd-user supported 1:1 mapping between guest and host
threads on FreeBSD, cpu_single_env would have to be thread-local.
This is the case for the bsd-user work that Stacey posted at the
beginning of the week and is
Il 28/06/2013 17:35, Ed Maste ha scritto:
On 28 June 2013 11:11, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
And of course if bsd-user supported 1:1 mapping between guest and host
threads on FreeBSD, cpu_single_env would have to be thread-local.
This is the case for the bsd-user work that
11 matches
Mail list logo
