Am 13.12.2011 17:02, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 12/13/2011 09:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.12.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 12/13/2011 05:35 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
I choose the serial device to
On 12/14/2011 04:33 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.12.2011 17:02, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
static TypeInfo e1000_device_info = {
.name = TYPE_E1000,
.parent = TYPE_PCI_DEVICE,
.instance_size = sizeof(E1000State),
.class_init = pci_generic_class_init,
.class_data
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
I choose the serial device to showcase what we'll eventually be able to do.
The three relevant files are:
https://github.com/aliguori/qemu/blob/qom-next/hw/isa-serial.c
On 12/13/2011 05:35 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
I choose the serial device to showcase what we'll eventually be able to do.
The three relevant files are:
Am 13.12.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 12/13/2011 05:35 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
I choose the serial device to showcase what we'll eventually be able to do.
The three relevant files are:
On 12/13/2011 09:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.12.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 12/13/2011 05:35 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
I choose the serial device to showcase what we'll eventually be able to do.
Hi,
I've spent the past week aggressively converting the tree to QEMU Object Model
and was successful in doing a mostly complete conversion. There are a couple of
outstanding issues regarding devices that are doing Bad Things but they aren't
that hard to fix up.
This is my development
Am 21.07.2011 18:32, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Just as we're now realizing that we need to do dramatic things in the
block layer to make -blockdev work, I'm sure we're going to realize that
we want to do PCI hotplug of virtio-serial and therefore we need to do
dynamic creation/destruction of
On 07/22/2011 02:46 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.07.2011 18:32, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Just as we're now realizing that we need to do dramatic things in the
block layer to make -blockdev work, I'm sure we're going to realize that
we want to do PCI hotplug of virtio-serial and therefore we need
Am 22.07.2011 14:40, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/22/2011 02:46 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.07.2011 18:32, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Just as we're now realizing that we need to do dramatic things in the
block layer to make -blockdev work, I'm sure we're going to realize that
we want to do
On 07/22/2011 08:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.07.2011 14:40, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/22/2011 02:46 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.07.2011 18:32, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Just as we're now realizing that we need to do dramatic things in the
block layer to make -blockdev work, I'm sure
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
[cut]
And it's really not that much nicer than the C version. The problem with
C++ is that even though the type system is much, much nicer, it still
doesn't have introspection or decorators. These two things would be
On 07/21/2011 06:19 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
[cut]
And it's really not that much nicer than the C version. The problem with
C++ is that even though the type system is much, much nicer, it still
doesn't have
On 07/21/2011 10:04 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 05:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 04:20 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
static TypeInfo tcp_server_type_info = {
.name = TYPE_TCP_SERVER,
.parent = TYPE_SOCKET_SERVER,
.instance_size =
On 07/21/2011 10:19 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
[cut]
And it's really not that much nicer than the C version. The problem with
C++ is that even though the type system is much, much nicer, it still
doesn't have
On 07/21/2011 06:45 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
See git://git.codemonkey.ws/kvm++.git
Connection refused..
Sorry, stupid EC2. Try http://git.codemonkey.ws/git/kvm++.git
You don't have permission to access /git/kvm++.git/ on this server.
It's exactly the same object model, but in
On 07/21/2011 05:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 04:20 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
static TypeInfo tcp_server_type_info = {
.name = TYPE_TCP_SERVER,
.parent = TYPE_SOCKET_SERVER,
.instance_size = sizeof(TcpServer),
.instance_init =
On 07/21/2011 08:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 04:20 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
static TypeInfo tcp_server_type_info = {
.name = TYPE_TCP_SERVER,
.parent = TYPE_SOCKET_SERVER,
.instance_size = sizeof(TcpServer),
.instance_init = tcp_server_init,
.class_init = tcp_server_class_init,
On 07/21/2011 10:57 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 06:45 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
See git://git.codemonkey.ws/kvm++.git
Connection refused..
Sorry, stupid EC2. Try http://git.codemonkey.ws/git/kvm++.git
You don't have permission to access /git/kvm++.git/ on this server.
git
Hi,
I've started an effort to introduce a consistent object model to QEMU.
Today, every subsystem implements an ad-hoc object model. These object
models all have the same basic properties but do things in arbitrarily
different ways:
1) Factory interface for object creation
- Objects
20 matches
Mail list logo
