On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 02:45, Heyi Guo wrote:
> On 2019/4/7 21:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > I don't think it makes much sense to keep adding UARTs for every
> > bit of the system software stack. We don't have an infinite
> > supply of UARTs on real hardware either -- how is this handled
> > there
On 2019/4/7 21:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 09:19, Heyi Guo wrote:
This patch is based on the discussion in TianoCore edk2-devel mailing
list:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037986.html
The conclusion is that we need an individual UART for UEFI
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 09:19, Heyi Guo wrote:
>
> This patch is based on the discussion in TianoCore edk2-devel mailing
> list:
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037986.html
>
> The conclusion is that we need an individual UART for UEFI runtime
> services to print debug
This patch is based on the discussion in TianoCore edk2-devel mailing
list:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037986.html
The conclusion is that we need an individual UART for UEFI runtime
services to print debug message at runtime, to avoid conflicting with
the system UART. We
