Peter Maydell writes:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 13:09, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Registering qbus_reset_all_fn() in main() is kind of ugly, but it works.
>> There's a comment pointing out it's ugly. Right now it's a TODO
>> comment, which maybe expresses more hope for cleanup than there really
On 5/23/19 2:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> ...so after this long thread, are we at a conclusion?
> I think my view is that the patch-as-sent needs to be
> revised to also fix bus_unparent() but is otherwise OK.
>
I think so too.
Damien
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 13:09, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Registering qbus_reset_all_fn() in main() is kind of ugly, but it works.
> There's a comment pointing out it's ugly. Right now it's a TODO
> comment, which maybe expresses more hope for cleanup than there really
> is. I'd leave it alone an
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 07:39, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>> > It's a well-defined order, but it doesn't actually help in a
>> > lot of cases, because often the thing you care about ordering
>> > on is not a device or is not in the same tree as t
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 07:39, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell writes:
> > It's a well-defined order, but it doesn't actually help in a
> > lot of cases, because often the thing you care about ordering
> > on is not a device or is not in the same tree as the thing
> > it depends on.
>
>
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 15:34, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> Damien Hedde writes:
>>
>> > On 5/16/19 11:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> A registry of callbacks to run on certain events is a fine tech
On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 15:34, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> Damien Hedde writes:
>
> > On 5/16/19 11:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A registry of callbacks to run on certain events is a fine technique.
> >>> Relying on registrat
Damien Hedde writes:
> On 5/16/19 11:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
In commit 80376c3fc2c38fdd453 in 2010 we added a workaround for
some qbus buses not being connected to qdev devices -- if the
>>
On 5/16/19 11:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> In commit 80376c3fc2c38fdd453 in 2010 we added a workaround for
>>> some qbus buses not being connected to qdev devices -- if the
>>> bus has no parent object t
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
> > In commit 80376c3fc2c38fdd453 in 2010 we added a workaround for
> > some qbus buses not being connected to qdev devices -- if the
> > bus has no parent object then we register a reset function which
> > resets
Peter Maydell writes:
> In commit 80376c3fc2c38fdd453 in 2010 we added a workaround for
> some qbus buses not being connected to qdev devices -- if the
> bus has no parent object then we register a reset function which
> resets the bus on system reset.
>
> Nearly a decade later, we have now no bu
In commit 80376c3fc2c38fdd453 in 2010 we added a workaround for
some qbus buses not being connected to qdev devices -- if the
bus has no parent object then we register a reset function which
resets the bus on system reset.
Nearly a decade later, we have now no buses in the tree which
are created w
12 matches
Mail list logo
