...@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefa...@redhat.com, aligu...@amazon.com
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 8:11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in
additionto vhost param'
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Pankaj Gupta pagu...@redhat.com
.
From: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
To: Pankaj Gupta pagu...@redhat.com
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefa...@redhat.com, aligu...@amazon.com
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 8:11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Pankaj Gupta pagu...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
guest don't have MSI-X support.
Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
like
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
guest don't have MSI-X support.
Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
guests without MSI-X support is getting
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
guest don't have MSI-X support.
Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
guests without MSI-X support is
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
guest don't have MSI-X support.
Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
guests without MSI-X
vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
guest don't have MSI-X support.
Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
guests without MSI-X support is getting less popular.
Its ok to remove this extra option and enable vhost
