On 17/09/15 15:09, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently the VFIOContainer iommu_data field contains a union with
> different information for different host iommu types. However:
>* It only actually contains information for the x86-like "Type1" iommu
>* Because we have a common listener the
On 17/09/2015 15:09, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently the VFIOContainer iommu_data field contains a union with
> different information for different host iommu types. However:
>* It only actually contains information for the x86-like "Type1" iommu
>* Because we have a common listener the
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:31:25PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/09/15 15:09, David Gibson wrote:
> > Currently the VFIOContainer iommu_data field contains a union with
> > different information for different host iommu types. However:
> >* It only actually contains information for the
On 09/17/2015 11:09 PM, David Gibson wrote:
Currently the VFIOContainer iommu_data field contains a union with
different information for different host iommu types. However:
* It only actually contains information for the x86-like "Type1" iommu
* Because we have a common listener the
Currently the VFIOContainer iommu_data field contains a union with
different information for different host iommu types. However:
* It only actually contains information for the x86-like "Type1" iommu
* Because we have a common listener the Type1 fields are actually used
on all IOMMU types,
