On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 14:33 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > I'm thinking maybe trying to support the CAS negotiation of interrupt
> > > controller from day 1 is warping the design. A better approach might
> > > be first to implement XIVE only when given a specific machine option -
> > >
On 09/22/2017 12:33 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 04:18:33PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 09/21/2017 03:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:33:37PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 09/19/2017 10:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 04:18:33PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 09/21/2017 03:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:33:37PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2017 10:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:20:20PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On 09/21/2017 03:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:33:37PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 09/19/2017 10:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:20:20PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:12:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:33:37PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 10:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:20:20PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:12:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> On a POWER9 sPAPR machine, the Client
On 09/19/2017 10:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:20:20PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:12:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On a POWER9 sPAPR machine, the Client Architecture Support (CAS)
>>> negotiation process determines whether the guest
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:20:20PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:12:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On a POWER9 sPAPR machine, the Client Architecture Support (CAS)
> > negotiation process determines whether the guest operates with an
> > interrupt controller
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:12:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On a POWER9 sPAPR machine, the Client Architecture Support (CAS)
> negotiation process determines whether the guest operates with an
> interrupt controller using the XICS legacy model, as found on POWER8,
> or in XIVE exploitation
On a POWER9 sPAPR machine, the Client Architecture Support (CAS)
negotiation process determines whether the guest operates with an
interrupt controller using the XICS legacy model, as found on POWER8,
or in XIVE exploitation mode, the newer POWER9 interrupt model. This
patchset is a proposal to
