Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-02-03 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series failed the docker-mingw@fedora build test. Please find the testing commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it locally. === TEST

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-02-01 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi, On 1/25/19 11:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > (I'm only momentarily at the helm and will give control back to Yang after > this iteration.) > > This is still RFC mostly because of the lack of documentation, and because > only x86 is fully converted, but it's converging. Other targets still >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU Message-id: 1548410831-19553-1-git

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True git config --local diff.algorithm histogram ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. === TEST SCRIPT END === Updating

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU Type: series Message-id: 1548410831

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU Type: series Message-id: 1548410831

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True git config --local diff.algorithm histogram ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. === TEST SCRIPT END === Updating

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU Message-id: 1548410831-19553-1-git

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-31 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU Type: series Message-id: 1548410831

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-25 Thread Yang Zhong
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:06:19AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > (I'm only momentarily at the helm and will give control back to Yang after > this iteration.) > > This is still RFC mostly because of the lack of documentation, and because > only x86 is fully converted, but it's converging. Other

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/52] Support Kconfig in QEMU

2019-01-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
(I'm only momentarily at the helm and will give control back to Yang after this iteration.) This is still RFC mostly because of the lack of documentation, and because only x86 is fully converted, but it's converging. Other targets still enable embedded devices in default-configs/ instead of