alvise rigo writes:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Alvise Rigo writes:
>>
>>> Attempting to simplify the helper_*_st_name, wrap the code relative to a
>>> RAM access into an inline function.
>>
>> This commit breaks a default x86_64-softmmu build:
>
> I see. Would
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Alvise Rigo writes:
>
>> Attempting to simplify the helper_*_st_name, wrap the code relative to a
>> RAM access into an inline function.
>
> This commit breaks a default x86_64-softmmu build:
I see. Would these three commits make more sense
Alvise Rigo writes:
> Attempting to simplify the helper_*_st_name, wrap the code relative to a
> RAM access into an inline function.
This commit breaks a default x86_64-softmmu build:
CCx86_64-softmmu/../hw/audio/pcspk.o
In file included from /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/cputlb.c:527:0:
Attempting to simplify the helper_*_st_name, wrap the code relative to a
RAM access into an inline function.
Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen
Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana
Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
---
softmmu_template.h | 110 +
1 file changed,
