Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT PATCH v1 0/3] net: smc91c111 can_receive fixes

2015-09-17 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:23:27PM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > Hi Richard, > > This should hopefully fix your bug, while addressing the extra concern > I raised. > > There was also inconsistent behaviour with corking packets through a > soft reset which I notice and fixed. > > Please let

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT PATCH v1 0/3] net: smc91c111 can_receive fixes

2015-09-15 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:23 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >> This should hopefully fix your bug, while addressing the extra concern >> I raised. >> >> There was also inconsistent behaviour

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT PATCH v1 0/3] net: smc91c111 can_receive fixes

2015-09-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 11:02 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:23 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > >> This should hopefully fix your bug, while addressing

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT PATCH v1 0/3] net: smc91c111 can_receive fixes

2015-09-14 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Peter, On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:23 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > This should hopefully fix your bug, while addressing the extra concern > I raised. > > There was also inconsistent behaviour with corking packets through a > soft reset which I notice and fixed. > > Please let me know if

[Qemu-devel] [RFT PATCH v1 0/3] net: smc91c111 can_receive fixes

2015-09-10 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
Hi Richard, This should hopefully fix your bug, while addressing the extra concern I raised. There was also inconsistent behaviour with corking packets through a soft reset which I notice and fixed. Please let me know if this works for you. Regards, Peter Peter Crosthwaite (3): net: