Pasi Kärkkäinen writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move / Xen on Xen nested virt):
Ping again? I wonder if I've gotten into some blacklist already for nagging
about this..
This is a required patch for making Xen-on-Xen Nested virt working
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:42:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move / Xen on Xen nested virt):
Ping again? I wonder if I've gotten into some blacklist already for nagging
about
and
cpu_ioreq_move
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
+target_phys_addr_t offset = (target_phys_addr_t)req-size *
i;
+if (req-df) addr
[mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 12:34 AM
To: Ian Campbell
Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Xu, Dongxiao; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com;
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify cpu_ioreq_pio
and
cpu_ioreq_move
: simplify cpu_ioreq_pio
and
cpu_ioreq_move
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
+target_phys_addr_t offset = (target_phys_addr_t)req-size * i
-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify cpu_ioreq_pio and
cpu_ioreq_move
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote
-Original Message-
From: Xu, Dongxiao
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:50 PM
To: Ian Jackson; Ian Campbell
Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com;
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify cpu_ioreq_pio and
cpu_ioreq_move
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
Stefano Stabellini writes ([Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
after reviewing the patch fix multiply issue for int and uint types
with Ian Jackson, we realized that cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move
Stefano Stabellini writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
+if (req-df) addr -= offset;
+else addr -= offset;
This can't be right, can it?
Indeed not. v2 has this fixed.
The search
cpu_ioreq_pio and
cpu_ioreq_move
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
+target_phys_addr_t offset = (target_phys_addr_t)req-size * i;
+if (req-df) addr -= offset
Stefano Stabellini writes ([Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
after reviewing the patch fix multiply issue for int and uint types
with Ian Jackson, we realized that cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move are
in much need for a simplification as well
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] QEMU/xen: simplify
cpu_ioreq_pio and cpu_ioreq_move):
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
+target_phys_addr_t offset = (target_phys_addr_t)req-size * i;
+if (req-df) addr -= offset;
+else addr -= offset
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:14 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
+target_phys_addr_t offset = (target_phys_addr_t)req-size * i;
+if (req-df) addr -= offset;
+else addr -= offset;
One of these -= should be a += I presume?
[...]
+write_phys_req_item((target_phys_addr_t)
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:21 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Also I think 4.2.1 need these patches to enable the basic Xen on Xen
nested virtualization usage scenario.
I agree.
Nested virt was a tech preview in 4.2.0, is it really worth
backporting ?
Ian.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:57:11PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:21 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Also I think 4.2.1 need these patches to enable the basic Xen on Xen
nested virtualization usage scenario.
I agree.
Nested virt was a tech preview in 4.2.0, is
15 matches
Mail list logo
