On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 09:20 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Is this expected?
Yes. Can you post it as a proper patch please.
I suggest you split the basic stuff and the kind override discussed
below in to two patches.
+(b_info-u.hvm.gfx_passthru
+
Campbell,
Are you free to look at my reply?
Thanks
Tiejun
On 2015/3/2 9:20, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Here I just mean when Qemu realizes IGD is passed through but without
that appropriate option set, Qemu can post something to explicitly
notify user that this option is needed in his case. But it
Here I just mean when Qemu realizes IGD is passed through but without
that appropriate option set, Qemu can post something to explicitly
notify user that this option is needed in his case. But it may be a lazy
idea.
In any case I think the additions of such warnings in qemu are a
separate to
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 10:45 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2015/2/9 19:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:28 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
What about this?
I've not read the code in detail,since I'm travelling but from a quick
glance it looks to be implementing the sort of
Ian,
Just ping this, or do you think I should send this as a patch?
Thanks
Tiejun
On 2015/2/11 10:45, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2015/2/9 19:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:28 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
What about this?
I've not read the code in detail,since I'm travelling
On 2015/2/9 19:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:28 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
What about this?
I've not read the code in detail,since I'm travelling but from a quick
glance it looks to be implementing the sort of thing I meant, thanks.
Thanks for your time.
A couple of
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:28 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
What about this?
I've not read the code in detail,since I'm travelling but from a quick
glance it looks to be implementing the sort of thing I meant, thanks.
A couple of higher level comments:
I'd suggest to put the code for reading the
On 2015/2/6 9:01, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2015/2/5 17:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:22 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Indeed this is not something workaround, and I think in any type of VGA
devices, we'd like to diminish this sort of thing gradually, right?
This mightn't come
On 2015/2/5 17:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:22 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Indeed this is not something workaround, and I think in any type of VGA
devices, we'd like to diminish this sort of thing gradually, right?
This mightn't come true in real world :)
It's not really
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:22 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Indeed this is not something workaround, and I think in any type of VGA
devices, we'd like to diminish this sort of thing gradually, right?
This mightn't come true in real world :)
It's not really something we can control, the h/w guys
10 matches
Mail list logo
