Il 21/02/2013 02:10, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
OTOH if the keyboard reset gets soft in qemu, then OVMF's hard reset
(the above code) will break. Maybe I could cycle between 0xCF9 and 0x64
in ResetCold(), starting with 0xCF9.
Yes, that's the right thing to do.
Also, in QEMU you're doing:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 09:36 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/02/2013 02:10, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
OTOH if the keyboard reset gets soft in qemu, then OVMF's hard reset
(the above code) will break. Maybe I could cycle between 0xCF9 and 0x64
in ResetCold(), starting with 0xCF9.
Yes,
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 02:10 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/21/13 00:55, David Woodhouse wrote:
Well... your test now works because of the bug that Anthony is trying to
fix :)
I don't believe so,
Ok, for the *specific* variant of the test that you did.
But there are many tests you could
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org writes:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 02:10 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/21/13 00:55, David Woodhouse wrote:
Well... your test now works because of the bug that Anthony is trying to
fix :)
I don't believe so,
Ok, for the *specific* variant of the test
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 08:37 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Help me understand where we're at. If you fix the bugs in UEFI and
SeaBIOS, and I correct the reset patches I pointed you at earlier, we're
good?
Yes. And merge the bit which resets the PAM configuration in the i440FX
on a hard
On 02/21/13 09:36, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/02/2013 02:10, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
OTOH if the keyboard reset gets soft in qemu, then OVMF's hard reset
(the above code) will break. Maybe I could cycle between 0xCF9 and 0x64
in ResetCold(), starting with 0xCF9.
Yes, that's the right thing
On 02/21/13 15:37, Anthony Liguori wrote:
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org writes:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 02:10 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/21/13 00:55, David Woodhouse wrote:
Well... your test now works because of the bug that Anthony is trying to
fix :)
I don't believe so,
Ok,
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 18:10 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Since
- I like kvm, and
- I cannot easily change my hardware (which doesn't support UG), and
- I prefer to run the RHEL-6 kernel which has old KVM,
I depend on David's fix for the PAM registers.
Which means your suspend/resume is broken.
Il 21/02/2013 18:12, David Woodhouse ha scritto:
Since
- I like kvm, and
- I cannot easily change my hardware (which doesn't support UG), and
- I prefer to run the RHEL-6 kernel which has old KVM,
I depend on David's fix for the PAM registers.
Which means your suspend/resume is broken.
On 02/21/13 18:12, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 18:10 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Since
- I like kvm, and
- I cannot easily change my hardware (which doesn't support UG), and
- I prefer to run the RHEL-6 kernel which has old KVM,
I depend on David's fix for the PAM registers.
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org writes:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 18:10 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Since
- I like kvm, and
- I cannot easily change my hardware (which doesn't support UG), and
- I prefer to run the RHEL-6 kernel which has old KVM,
I depend on David's fix for the PAM
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 21/02/2013 18:12, David Woodhouse ha scritto:
Since
- I like kvm, and
- I cannot easily change my hardware (which doesn't support UG), and
- I prefer to run the RHEL-6 kernel which has old KVM,
I depend on David's fix for the PAM registers.
12 matches
Mail list logo
