On 19.02.2018 13:15, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 19.02.2018 09:50, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>> On 17.02.2018 09:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> I still think that the information should *not* be stored within the
>>> IplParameterBlock to avoid that we pass it via DIAG 0x308, too.
>>>
On 19.02.2018 09:50, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 17.02.2018 09:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> I still think that the information should *not* be stored within the
>> IplParameterBlock to avoid that we pass it via DIAG 0x308, too.
>> If we do it like this, I'm pretty sure that we will look
On 17.02.2018 09:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...]
>
> I still think that the information should *not* be stored within the
> IplParameterBlock to avoid that we pass it via DIAG 0x308, too.
> If we do it like this, I'm pretty sure that we will look at this code in
> a couple of years and wonder
On 16.02.2018 23:07, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> The s390-ccw firmware needs some information in support of the
> boot process which is not available on the native machine.
> Examples are the netboot firmware load address and now the
> boot menu parameters.
>
> While storing that data in unused
