On Mon, 19 Aug. 2019, 23:01 Richard Henderson,
wrote:
> On 8/19/19 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 19/08/19 20:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the
> >>> filter of the qemu-s390x
On 8/19/19 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/08/19 20:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the
>>> filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please:
>>>
>>> 1) Try to break it up in
On 19/08/19 20:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the
>> filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please:
>>
>> 1) Try to break it up in more digestible pieces, e.g. change only one
>>
On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the
> filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please:
>
> 1) Try to break it up in more digestible pieces, e.g. change only one
> subsystem at a time (this is also better
On 8/16/19 9:37 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
> Simplify endianness comparisons with consistent use of the more
> expressive MemOp.
>
> Suggested-by: Richard Henderson
> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
> Acked-by: David Gibson
This patch is *huge*, more than
