subject:"\[Qemu\-devel\] \[question\] is it posssible that big\-endian l1 table offset referenced by other I\/O while updating l1 table offset in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount\?"

Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] is it posssible that big-endian l1 table offset referenced by other I/O while updating l1 table offset in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount?

2014-10-09 Thread Eric Blake

On 10/09/2014 05:17 AM, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > Hi, > I encounter a problem that after deleting snaptshot, the qcow2 image size is > very larger than that it should be displayed by ls command, > but the virtual disk size is okay via qemu-img info. > I suspect that during updating l1 table offset, ot

[Qemu-devel] [question] is it posssible that big-endian l1 table offset referenced by other I/O while updating l1 table offset in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount?

2014-10-09 Thread Zhang Haoyu

Hi, I encounter a problem that after deleting snaptshot, the qcow2 image size is very larger than that it should be displayed by ls command, but the virtual disk size is okay via qemu-img info. I suspect that during updating l1 table offset, other I/O job reference the big-endian l1 table offset