Il 06/06/2014 05:06, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2014-06-03:
Il 30/05/2014 10:59, Tiejun Chen ha scritto:
+static int create_pch_isa_bridge(PCIBus *bus, XenHostPCIDevice *hdev)
+{
+struct PCIDevice *dev;
+
+char rid;
+
+dev = pci_create(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f, 0),
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2014-06-03:
Il 30/05/2014 10:59, Tiejun Chen ha scritto:
+static int create_pch_isa_bridge(PCIBus *bus, XenHostPCIDevice *hdev)
+{
+struct PCIDevice *dev;
+
+char rid;
+
+dev = pci_create(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f, 0), intel-pch-isa-bridge);
This is really a
Il 30/05/2014 10:59, Tiejun Chen ha scritto:
+static int create_pch_isa_bridge(PCIBus *bus, XenHostPCIDevice *hdev)
+{
+struct PCIDevice *dev;
+
+char rid;
+
+dev = pci_create(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f, 0), intel-pch-isa-bridge);
This is really a huge hack. You're going to have two ISA
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/05/2014 10:59, Tiejun Chen ha scritto:
+static int create_pch_isa_bridge(PCIBus *bus, XenHostPCIDevice *hdev)
+{
+struct PCIDevice *dev;
+
+char rid;
+
+dev = pci_create(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f, 0), intel-pch-isa-bridge);
Il 03/06/2014 13:29, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
It's really not your fault, there's not much you can do given the hardware
architecture. But I don't think this code can be accepted upstream, sorry.
Yeah, the code is not nice and it is not Tiejun's fault.
Is there any way at all he could
On 06/03/2014 12:29 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/05/2014 10:59, Tiejun Chen ha scritto:
+static int create_pch_isa_bridge(PCIBus *bus, XenHostPCIDevice *hdev)
+{
+struct PCIDevice *dev;
+
+char rid;
+
+dev = pci_create(bus,
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/06/2014 13:29, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
It's really not your fault, there's not much you can do given the hardware
architecture. But I don't think this code can be accepted upstream,
sorry.
Yeah, the code is not nice and it is
From: Paolo Bonzini
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 4:40 AM
Il 03/06/2014 13:29, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
It's really not your fault, there's not much you can do given the hardware
architecture. But I don't think this code can be accepted upstream, sorry.
Yeah, the code is not
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Tiejun Chen wrote:
ISA bridge is needed since Intel gfx drive will probe it instead
of Dev31:Fun0 to make graphics device passthrough work easy for VMM, that
only need to expose ISA bridge to let driver know the real hardware
underneath.
The original patch is from
ISA bridge is needed since Intel gfx drive will probe it instead
of Dev31:Fun0 to make graphics device passthrough work easy for VMM, that
only need to expose ISA bridge to let driver know the real hardware underneath.
The original patch is from Allen Kay [allen.m@intel.com]
Signed-off-by:
10 matches
Mail list logo
