[EMAIL PROTECTED]/p1 ~/src/c/todd/test?100$ ./sizeof
sizeof(char) = 1
sizeof(short) = 2
sizeof(int) = 4
sizeof(char *) = 4
sizeof(long) = 4
sizeof(long long) = 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/p1 ~/src/c/todd/test?101$ uname -a
OpenBSD cloud.fries.net 4.1 GENERIC#7 mac68k
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/p1 ~/src/c/todd/test?
Windows 3.1 is not an OS.
And there is no Windows for 286 protected mode.
There is OS/2 and UNIXen but none works (OS/2 2.0 and later UNIXen works
but they are 386 protected mode)
El mar, 17-04-2007 a las 00:35 +0100, Derek Fawcus escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:55:17PM +0100, Natalia Por
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:55:17PM +0100, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> Yes but...
>
> Currently no protected mode 286 guest OS runs under qemu.
Windows 3.1 Standard mode? (Delete / Rename KRNL386.EXE)
DF
>
> El dom, 15-04-2007 a las 14:46 +0100, Nigel Horne escribió:
> > Let me approach this in
Yes but...
Currently no protected mode 286 guest OS runs under qemu.
El dom, 15-04-2007 a las 14:46 +0100, Nigel Horne escribió:
> Let me approach this in a different way in the hope that I'll get an answer
> to my
> question: will Qemu run a 286 guest O/S?
>
> -Nige
Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 14:46, Nigel Horne wrote:
Let me approach this in a different way in the hope that I'll get an answer
to my question: will Qemu run a 286 guest O/S?
Yes.
Good.
Followup question, if the guest O/S is multi-architecture, will it run in 386
mode (which
On Sunday 15 April 2007 14:46, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Let me approach this in a different way in the hope that I'll get an answer
> to my question: will Qemu run a 286 guest O/S?
Yes.
Paul
Let me approach this in a different way in the hope that I'll get an answer to
my
question: will Qemu run a 286 guest O/S?
-Nige
begin:vcard
fn:Nigel Horne
n:Horne;Nigel
org:NJH Music
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;fax:+44 870 705 9334
note:Skype: nigelhorne
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.
> > My point is that pretty much anything that runs on a 286 should also run
> > on any subsequent x86 processor. If you want to test 16-bit x86
> > software/systems you don't need an actual 286. A 386 is just as good for
> > almost all purposes.
>
> How does that address my issue?
You wanted a 28
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I can't remember now what sizeof(int) and sizeof(char *) were on m68k
>>> machines.
>>
>> It depends. Try -mshort.
>
> That's not much help, I'm sorry to say, because you need an m68
Paul Brook wrote:
Modern x86 are backwards compatible[*], so you should be able to do that
anyway.
Care to share with us how I do that? Is it an option to gcc?
gcc does not support 16-bit mode.
My point is that pretty much anything that runs on a 286 should also run on
any subsequent x86 pro
> > Modern x86 are backwards compatible[*], so you should be able to do that
> > anyway.
>
> Care to share with us how I do that? Is it an option to gcc?
gcc does not support 16-bit mode.
My point is that pretty much anything that runs on a 286 should also run on
any subsequent x86 processor. If
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I can't remember now what sizeof(int) and sizeof(char *) were on m68k machines.
It depends. Try -mshort.
That's not much help, I'm sorry to say, because you need an m68k machine to use
it on, and there's no qemu-system-m68k, onl
Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 13:08, Nigel Horne wrote:
Stuart Brady wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
Can qemu emulate 16-bit machines (286?)?
None that I'm aware of. Is there any particular need for 286 emulation?
To test my code on machines w
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't remember now what sizeof(int) and sizeof(char *) were on m68k
> machines.
It depends. Try -mshort.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint
On Sunday 15 April 2007 13:08, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Stuart Brady wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> >> Can qemu emulate 16-bit machines (286?)?
> >
> > None that I'm aware of. Is there any particular need for 286 emulation?
>
> To test my code on machines whe
Stuart Brady wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
Can qemu emulate 16-bit machines (286?)?
None that I'm aware of. Is there any particular need for 286 emulation?
To test my code on machines where sizeof(int) == sizeof(short), and
sizeof(int) != sizeof(long).
On Sunday 15 April 2007 12:33, Stuart Brady wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Can qemu emulate 16-bit machines (286?)?
>
> None that I'm aware of. Is there any particular need for 286 emulation?
> OTOH, it might be interesting to see some m68k system emulati
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Can qemu emulate 16-bit machines (286?)?
None that I'm aware of. Is there any particular need for 286 emulation?
OTOH, it might be interesting to see some m68k system emulation.
I've been working on an 8-bit machine, with some succes
18 matches
Mail list logo
