> On 07 Apr 2016, at 03:46, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
>
> ... don't hesitate to appropriate, or ignore, what I've done so far. ...
> https://github.com/mdavidsaver/qemu/tree/fixirq2
from what I see here, the nvic is still one big monolithic device.
as I said before, I like modular things, and
On 04/06/2016 06:23 PM, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 07 Apr 2016, at 01:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> ... Somebody needs to do the necessary work to fix the
>> code review issues. ...
>
> in this case I'll probably wait for this process to be completed and
> reevaluate the situation by then.
> On 07 Apr 2016, at 01:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> ... Somebody needs to do the necessary work to fix the
> code review issues. ...
in this case I'll probably wait for this process to be completed and reevaluate
the situation by then.
regards,
Liviu
On 6 April 2016 at 22:54, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 06 Apr 2016, at 17:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 6 April 2016 at 13:52, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>>>
>>> I also have on my TODO list to implement the SCB registers used
>>> during exception processing (MMFAR, BFAR, CFSR); I checked and
>>> i
> On 06 Apr 2016, at 17:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 6 April 2016 at 13:52, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>>
>> I also have on my TODO list to implement the SCB registers used
>> during exception processing (MMFAR, BFAR, CFSR); I checked and
>> in version 2.5.1 apparently they are still not implemen
On 6 April 2016 at 13:52, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 06 Apr 2016, at 15:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 5 April 2016 at 22:57, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>>> (I know that from time to time this question pops up, but) is
>>> there anyone working or planning to work on the M4 emulation?
>>
>> Not th
> On 06 Apr 2016, at 15:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 5 April 2016 at 22:57, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>> (I know that from time to time this question pops up, but) is
>> there anyone working or planning to work on the M4 emulation?
>
> Not that I'm aware of; Michael Davidsaver had some patches f
On 5 April 2016 at 22:57, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> (I know that from time to time this question pops up, but) is
> there anyone working or planning to work on the M4 emulation?
Not that I'm aware of; Michael Davidsaver had some patches for
improving the v7M interrupt/exception emulation, but I don'
(I know that from time to time this question pops up, but) is there anyone
working or planning to work on the M4 emulation?
If not, I might give it a try, perhaps it is not as mission impossible as it
looks like. Except the lazy processing of exception save/restore which must be
implemented, is
