Am 14.03.2008 um 00:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Vernam wrote:
[gcc4] Not supported? Okay, fine. But don't tell me it can't work.
The fact of the matter is that I use it daily.
Make configure fail horribly? Well, that seems a bit counter-
productive,
don't
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 14.03.2008 um 00:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Vernam wrote:
[gcc4] Not supported? Okay, fine. But don't tell me it can't work.
The fact of the matter is that I use it daily.
Make configure fail
Hi,
Am 14.03.2008 um 11:53 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 14.03.2008 um 00:32 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Vernam wrote:
[gcc4] Not supported? Okay, fine. But don't tell me it can't
work.
The fact of the matter is
Well done, guys. Someone's trying to build CVS QEMU on gcc4, and
you're flaming them. This'll really encourage people to work on
making development versions of QEMU work with gcc4.
On 14 Mar 2008, at 10:53, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
WTF?
The point at which you start using profanity on a
WTF? Rick suggested removing that configure message that you need to
explicitely override its quite sane default to refuse work with gcc4,
because at least one platform (the most common one) has problems with it.
I did? where? when? You might have mis-read something.
I was against
On Friday 14 March 2008 06:07:37 am Andreas Färber wrote:
So I absolutely _fail_ to understand what you thought, implying that
I was
restricting platform variability.
So in fact you do agree with Rick on that part and replied to the
'wrong' message, creating minor confusion: In your
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:59:28 am Rick Vernam wrote:
And it is necessary to have configure require a special step to build with
gcc4 anyway.
necessary, as in a very good idea.
necessary to inform those who might not otherwise know...
Philip Boulain wrote:
Well done, guys. Someone's trying to build CVS QEMU on gcc4, and you're
flaming them. This'll really encourage people to work on making
development versions of QEMU work with gcc4.
May I recommend to everybody involved to cool down a bit?
Working on converting more of
Pulling todays CVS (including Aurelien Jaron's recent commits), I've not been
able to build.
./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-ac97 --enable-alsa --disable-vnc-tls
--disable-linux-user --disable-gcc-check --target-list=i386-softmmu
make
[...]
gcc -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
Which part of gcc 4.x is not supported didn't you understand?
Paul
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
Which part of gcc 4.x is not supported didn't you understand?
Paul
Apparently, we should make configure fail horribly if gcc4 is found even
if disable-gcc-check is enabled.
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Ben Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
Which part of gcc 4.x is not supported didn't you understand?
Apparently, we should make configure fail horribly if gcc4 is found even
On Thursday 13 March 2008 04:27:29 pm Ben Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
Which part of gcc 4.x is not supported didn't you understand?
Paul
Apparently, we should make configure fail horribly
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Vernam wrote:
[gcc4] Not supported? Okay, fine. But don't tell me it can't work.
The fact of the matter is that I use it daily.
Make configure fail horribly? Well, that seems a bit counter-productive,
don't you think?
If you would only have researched a
14 matches
Mail list logo
