On 03/23/2012 07:58 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:48:43 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-21 13:38, GaoYi wrote:
Hi Jan,
Since the newest Intel-VT supports the guest OS under the real
mode,
So if the VT already supports unrestricted guest, KVM can then runs such
guest?
在 2012年3月25日 下午5:55，Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com写道：
On 03/23/2012 07:58 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:48:43 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Jan Kiszka
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:48:43 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-21 13:38, GaoYi wrote:
Hi Jan,
Since the newest Intel-VT supports the guest OS under the real mode,
which was already supported in AMD-V, can the VMX in
On 2012-03-21 13:38, GaoYi wrote:
Hi Jan,
Since the newest Intel-VT supports the guest OS under the real mode,
which was already supported in AMD-V, can the VMX in the latest KVM support
that case?
Yes, both with our without that unrestricted guest support (as Intel
called it), real
On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-21 13:38, GaoYi wrote:
Hi Jan,
Since the newest Intel-VT supports the guest OS under the real mode,
which was already supported in AMD-V, can the VMX in the latest KVM support
that case?
Yes, both with our without that
Hi Jan,
Since the newest Intel-VT supports the guest OS under the real mode,
which was already supported in AMD-V, can the VMX in the latest KVM support
that case?
Thanks,
Yi
Hi,
Thanks for your prompt response. So if the CPU supports the real
mode, the KVM can support the real mode guest and there is still work to be
done for CPU without real mode support, namely software emulation?
Again
在 2012年3月21日 下午9:48，Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com写道：
On 03/21/2012 03:40
