On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> >>>I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>> >> On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
Am 05.07.2011 20:18, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
> >> On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnocz
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>> On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> >>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
>> >>>I tr
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:04:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 05:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
> >>On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On T
On 07/05/2011 05:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
I tried to re-arrange all
Am 05.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>> On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> I tried to re-
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> >>>I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using
On 07/05/2011 03:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using this wiki
page: http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LiveBlockMigration
It
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> > I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using this wiki
> > page: http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LiveBlockMigration
> >
> > It would be the best to agree upon t
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using this wiki
> page: http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LiveBlockMigration
>
> It would be the best to agree upon the most interesting use cases (while we
> make sure we cover future ones) a
I tried to re-arrange all of the requirements and use cases using this
wiki page: http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LiveBlockMigration
It would be the best to agree upon the most interesting use cases (while
we make sure we cover future ones) and agree to them.
The next step is to set the interface
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:52:00PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.06.2011 16:36, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
> >> 4. Live block copy API and high-level control - the main code that
> >> adds the live block copy feature. Existing patches by Marcelo, can be
> >> restructured to use common core by Mar
Am 30.06.2011 16:36, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
>> 4. Live block copy API and high-level control - the main code that
>> adds the live block copy feature. Existing patches by Marcelo, can be
>> restructured to use common core by Marcelo.
>
> Can use your proposed block_stream interface, with a "blo
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:54:09PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> This can be used to merge data from an intermediate image without
> >> merging the base image. When
On 06/28/2011 08:48 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/28/2011 04:43 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
FYI, I'm in an all-day meeting so I can't attend.
Did you do something really bad?
I named some variables with a leading underscore and now have to be
re-educated.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> This can be used to merge data from an intermediate image without
>> merging the base image. When streaming completes the backing file
>> will be set to the base image.
Am 30.06.2011 13:48, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> In the future we could add a 'base' argument to block_stream. If base
>>> is specified then data contained in the base im
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> In the future we could add a 'base' argument to block_stream. If base
>> is specified then data contained in the base image will not be copied.
>
> This is a present requi
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:08:23AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 28.06.2011 21:41, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
> >> stream
> >> --
> >>
> >> 1) base <- remote
> >> 2) base <- remote <- local
> >> 3) base <- local
> >>
> >> "local" image
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 28.06.2011 21:41, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
>> stream
>> --
>>
>> 1) base <- remote
>> 2) base <- remote <- local
>> 3) base <- local
>>
>> "local" image is always valid. Requires backing file support.
>
> With the above, this restriction
Am 28.06.2011 21:41, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>> Live block copy and image streaming:
>> * The differe
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>> Live block copy and image streaming:
>> *
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> Live block copy and image streaming:
> * The differences between Marcelo and Kevin's approaches
> * Wh
On 06/28/2011 04:43 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
FYI, I'm in an all-day meeting so I can't attend.
Did you do something really bad?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On 06/27/2011 09:32 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
FYI, I'm in an all-day meeting so I can't attend.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Later, Juan.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Live block copy and image streaming:
* The differences between Marcelo and Kevin's approaches
* Which approach to choose and who can help implement it
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Later, Juan.
29 matches
Mail list logo