Mulyadi Santosa writes:
> I know nothing about your patch, but I suggest to rewrite this post so
> it follows patch submission format e.g comment, signed off then the
> patch itself :)
> No offense, ok? :)
None taken. I've sent it again with (I suppose) the adequate format.
Lluis
--
"And
Hi :)
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 02:44, Lluís wrote:
> I'm still not very tuned-in into the code, but I think this piece should
> use _raw access primitives:
I know nothing about your patch, but I suggest to rewrite this post so
it follows patch submission format e.g comment, signed off then the
pat
I'm still not very tuned-in into the code, but I think this piece should
use _raw access primitives:
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
index 77683f7..097da9d 100644
--- a/linux-user/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/signal.c
@@ -982,8 +982,8 @@ restore_sigcontext(CPUX86State *env, str