On 06/07/17 15:36, Markus Armbruster wrote:
I see two ways to continue:
1. A new kind of pci-bridge should be created with a "special"
secondary bus that has less slots. (harder to implement)
2. Add the limitation of the number of slots to the PCIBus class,
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> On 06/07/2017 14:25, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
>>
>>> On 05/07/2017 21:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
>> [...]
> It seems like limiting the
On 06/07/2017 14:25, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
On 05/07/2017 21:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
[...]
It seems like limiting the size of the bus would solve the majority of
the problem. I've
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> On 05/07/2017 21:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
[...]
>>> It seems like limiting the size of the bus would solve the majority of
>>> the problem. I've had a quick look around pci.c and while I
On 05/07/2017 21:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
On 05/07/17 16:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
various design
On 05/07/17 19:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> It seems like limiting the size of the bus would solve the majority of
>> the problem. I've had a quick look around pci.c and while I can see that
>> the PCIBus creation functions take a devfn_min parameter, I can't see
>> anything that limits the
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
> On 05/07/17 16:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
> qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
> various design restrictions I need to be
On 05/07/17 16:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
various design restrictions I need to be able to restrict how devices
are added to the machine with
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
> On 05/07/17 06:38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Copying Marcel for PCI expertise.
>>
>> Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
On 05/07/17 06:38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Copying Marcel for PCI expertise.
>
> Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
>> qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
On 04/07/17 21:44, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 07:25:41PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
>> qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
>> various design restrictions I
Copying Marcel for PCI expertise.
Mark Cave-Ayland writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
> qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
> various design restrictions I need to be able to
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 07:25:41PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
> qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
> various design restrictions I need to be able to restrict how devices
> are added
Hi all,
I've been working on a patchset that brings the sun4u machine on
qemu-system-sparc64 much closer to a real Ultra 5, however due to
various design restrictions I need to be able to restrict how devices
are added to the machine with -device.
On a real Ultra 5, the root PCI bus (sabre) has
14 matches
Mail list logo