Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory Map

2011-03-03 Thread Salvatore Lionetti
-devel] Memory Map A: Salvatore Lionetti salvatorelione...@yahoo.it Cc: Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Data: Mercoledì 2 marzo 2011, 22:13 Hi, On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:11, Salvatore Lionetti salvatorelione...@yahoo.it wrote: Still now, some memory region is called

Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory Map

2011-03-02 Thread Salvatore Lionetti
(write from uP register) cause read(opaque, offset=4, value) The two opaque are different as expected. Where i am wrong? --- Ven 25/2/11, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory Map A: Salvatore Lionetti salvatorelione

Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory Map

2011-03-02 Thread Vincent Palatin
Hi, On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:11, Salvatore Lionetti salvatorelione...@yahoo.it wrote: Still now, some memory region is called with base+offset. So: [0x204] = value (write from uP register) cause read(opaque, offset=204, value) while [0x504] = value (write from uP register) cause

Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory Map

2011-02-25 Thread Blue Swirl
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Salvatore Lionetti salvatorelione...@yahoo.it wrote: Hi, This is what my board do cpu_register_physical_memory(0, 128*1024*1024, ...) cpu_register_physical_memory(0xFF80, 8*1024*1024, ...) and this layout does not change over the entire live (virtual)

[Qemu-devel] Memory Map

2011-02-24 Thread Salvatore Lionetti
Hi, This is what my board do cpu_register_physical_memory(0, 128*1024*1024, ...) cpu_register_physical_memory(0xFF80, 8*1024*1024, ...) and this layout does not change over the entire live (virtual) of the board. For the following offset (1st column) and size in bytes (2nd column)