On 03/02/2016 11:46 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * John Snow (js...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Hi Juan;
>> We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs for migrating
>> some block data so we can move forward with the feature.
>>
>> First, some background:
>>
>> What: Block Dirty
* John Snow (js...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi Juan;
> We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs for migrating
> some block data so we can move forward with the feature.
>
> First, some background:
>
> What: Block Dirty Bitmaps. They are simple primitives that keep track of
> which
Of course I have a nasty habit of responding before seeing replies,
apologies.
On 03/01/2016 10:24 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 01.03.2016 16:47, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> John Snow wrote:
>>> Hi Juan;
>>> We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs
On 03/01/2016 08:47 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> John Snow wrote:
>> Hi Juan;
>> We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs for migrating
>> some block data so we can move forward with the feature.
>>
>> First, some background:
>>
>> What: Block Dirty Bitmaps.
On 01.03.2016 16:47, Juan Quintela wrote:
John Snow wrote:
Hi Juan;
We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs for migrating
some block data so we can move forward with the feature.
First, some background:
What: Block Dirty Bitmaps. They are simple
John Snow wrote:
> Hi Juan;
> We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs for migrating
> some block data so we can move forward with the feature.
>
> First, some background:
>
> What: Block Dirty Bitmaps. They are simple primitives that keep track of
> which
Hi Juan;
We need your assistance in reviewing two competing designs for migrating
some block data so we can move forward with the feature.
First, some background:
What: Block Dirty Bitmaps. They are simple primitives that keep track of
which clusters have been written to since the last