On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
we wish to refactor and ultimately push to mainline. Before I go about
reworking it, I wish to discuss the architecture of this
Hello John,
Am 05.04.2012 01:35, schrieb John Williams:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
we wish to refactor and ultimately push to mainline. Before I go about
Thanks for you thoughts Andreas,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Hello John,
Am 05.04.2012 01:35, schrieb John Williams:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353
Hi Everyone,
We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
we wish to refactor and ultimately push to mainline. Before I go about
reworking it, I wish to discuss the architecture of this device model
because its non-trivial. The pl353 is sysbus slave that is a combined