Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
1. Only fixes will be applied.
2. Patches will be applied only
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
AFAICT 727da25d(Fix broken absoluteness check for cabs.d.*) is not
necessary, as it is for the MIPS target, which is not supposed to work
right now. But I'm sure if I'm wrong, Thiemo will correct me right
So, Lauros, seems like all the commits since 0.9.1 (including the two new
ones, Fix typo which broke MIPS32R2 64-bit FPU support and qemu
manpage: describe arguments of usbdevice option, by Aurelien Jarno) are
candidates for the stable branch...
applied.
Lauro
As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
1. Only fixes will be applied.
2. Patches will be applied only after they are applied on qemu head.
The repository is
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote:
Hey where is the QEMU IRC channel? I wouldn't mind being a fly on the
wall in there.
#qemu on irc.freenode.net
Hth,
Dscho
Very good !
Now, what about the bugzilla ? where to fill bug reports against the stable
version ?
--
-Alexey Eremenko Technologov
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
1. Only fixes will be applied.
2. Patches will be applied only after they are applied on qemu head.
Hey where is the QEMU IRC channel? I wouldn't mind being a fly on the
wall in there.
On Jan 9, 2008 11:03 AM, Lauro Ramos Venancio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
