On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:01 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 14:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:06 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState
J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
Other than that it looks good to me (and reminds me to check what the
supervisor mode on MIPS actually does now :-).
This updated patch gives the opportunity to define a per-target semantic
of the mmu_idx... Time to check what it means in actual CPU
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:06 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function in
targets cpu.h header.
The idea of this patch is:
- avoid many
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:46 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:06 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function
in
Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function in
targets cpu.h header.
The idea of this patch is:
- avoid many #ifdef TARGET_xxx in exec-all.h and softmmu_header.h then
make the code more readable
- avoid multiple implementation of the same code (3, in that particular
J. Mayer wrote:
Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function in
targets cpu.h header.
The idea of this patch is:
- avoid many #ifdef TARGET_xxx in exec-all.h and softmmu_header.h then
make the code more readable
- avoid multiple implementation of the same code (3,
