Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Blue Swirl wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Index: qemu/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h
> > > ===
> > > --- qemu.orig/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h2007-10-11
> > > 1
Blue Swirl wrote:
[snip]
> Index: qemu/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h
> ===
> --- qemu.orig/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h2007-10-11 19:17:14.0
> +
> +++ qemu/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h 2007-10-11 19:17:46.0 +000
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 22:26 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> > >> J. Mayer wrote:
> > >>> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> > >>> were still problems that
Blue Swirl wrote:
[snip]
> > >> I would think this feature will be limited to platforms which can handle
> > >> 32bit and 64bit binaries with a single personality.
> > >
> > > I am not sure it is a common case !
> > >
> > > However, I suggest to emulate a 32 bit user linux system with a 64 bit
> >
On 10/11/07, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> >>> J. Mayer wrote:
> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables t
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>>> J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[.
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 22:02 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> > >> J. Mayer wrote:
> > >>> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> > >>> were still problems that
On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> >> J. Mayer wrote:
> >>> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> >>> were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
> >>> bits target
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 19:01 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/10/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> > were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
> > bits target in linux user mode emulation
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[...]
Are you sure it is a good idea to try to add
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
>> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
>> were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
>> bits target in linux user mode emulation.
> > [...]
>
> Are you sure it is a good idea to try to add 32 bi
On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> > were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
> > bits target in linux user mode emulation.
> > [...]
>
> Are you sure
On 10/10/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
> were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
> bits target in linux user mode emulation.
> First of all, the personality was never set to PER_LINUX3
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
> [...]
Are you sure it is a good idea to try to add 32 bit executable support
to a 64 bit ta
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
First of all, the personality was never set to PER_LINUX32
The second problem was that pointers used to set the va
15 matches
Mail list logo